My good friend Nancy W from Little Rock Ark wrote me the other day with a concern she has with State Board of Education of Texas. You might ask why does someone in Arkansas care about the SBOE? The reason is that the SBOE of Texas is the state that about 46 or 47 states in the US follow when it comes to deciding on school books for their schools. So, don’t we make good book choices? Not according to many citizens and school officials. Texas has become the battlefield for issues revolving around science and creationism and more recently over what is being included in history and government books as it pertains to references to the founding fathers creating a Christian nation. According to many, this is first of all not true and trying create the impression that that this misrepresentation is a clear breach of the “wall of separation between Church and state” that Thomas Jefferson spoke about. The current issue is whether the United States was conceived as a Christian nation. Conservatives argue that it was. Others would say that the founding fathers even though religious espoused the idea that God was not necessarily a Christian God. Consider the words of the Declaration of Independence that states, “When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation…..that all men are endowed by their Creator…. This asserts that God has a hand in the affairs of men but that is more a deist conception of God, rather than a Trinitarian God.
A good book to give a balanced assessment of religion in the creation of the United States is Jon Mecham’s book American Gospel. Here are several quotes attributed to the founders. (2006)
“Writing to a Hebrew Congregation in Newport, R.I., in 1790, President Washington assured his Jewish countrymen that America “gives…bigotry no sanction.” In a treaty with the Muslim nation of Tripoli initiated by Washington, completed by John Adams, and ratified by the senate in 1797, the Founders declared that, “ the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion…” p. 19
Benjamin Franklin wrote in 1790:“ I believe in one God, creator of the universe. That he governs it by his Providence. That he ought to be worshiped. That the most acceptable service we can render to him is doing good to his other children. That the soul of man is immortal, and will be treated with justice in another life respecting its conduct in this. These I take to be the fundamental principles of all sound religion, and I regard them as you do, in whatever sect I meet with them.
As to Jesus of Nazareth…I think the system of morals and his religion as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting changes, an I have…some doubts as to his divinity; though it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the truth with less trouble.” P.2
“On the dogmas of religion, as distinguished from moral principles,” he [Jefferson] said, “ all mankind, from the beginning of the world to this day, have been quarreling, fighting, burning, and torturing one another, for abstractions unintelligible to themselves and to all others, and absolutely beyond the comprehension of the human mind.” P. 29
“I never told my religion nor scrutinized that of another,” Jefferson wrote. “I never attempted to make a convert, nor wish to changer another’s creed. I have ever judged of the religion of others by their lives…” “ For it is in our lives, and not from our words, that our religion must be read,” Jefferson said. “By the same test the world must judge me.” P.35
The most controversial appointee running for re-election Don McLeroy and his opponent Thomas Ratliff are so far down the Republican primary ballot they’re lost in the myriad of judges, representative and straw votes that it’ll be difficult to find them, much less know the issues involved.
I’m sorry Nancy, but anyway, here’s your comment it its entirety.
I believe it is unethical to use one’s narrow religious beliefs to determine laws and regulations that apply to public schools. Of course, a public servant makes decisions based on his/her belief and faith, but not when it goes against scientific data and affects the common good. The enrollment of children in public education is very diverse and different from a private academy which may teach values that reflect their faith. For instance, I would not vote for something that proposed a prayer which could not be accepted by all children in the school classroom (ie, Jewish, Muslim, Catholics, etc) and I would not propose teaching a particular view of the universe that opposed the best knowledge of science. Even though I had retired from teaching when I served on the State Board of Education in my state, I learned that curriculum issues should be driven by the professional staff. I believe it is unethical to use one’s narrow religious beliefs to determine laws and regulations that apply to public schools. Of course, a public servant makes decisions based on his/her belief and faith, but not when it goes against scientific data and affects the common good. The enrollment of children in public education is very diverse and different from a private academy which may teach values that reflect their faith. For instance, I would not vote for something that proposed a prayer which could not be accepted by all children in the school classroom (ie, Jewish, Muslim, Catholics, etc) and I would not propose teaching a particular view of the universe that opposed the best knowledge of science. Even though I had retired from teaching when I served on the State Board of Education in my state, I learned that curriculum issues should be driven by the professional staff.

This is a very interesting and at times has been a controversial subject. A few years ago I become aware that the State Board of Education of Texas had or has become a group a very conservative individuals intent on forcing its religious beliefs on the students of Texas through the selection of the text books it (the SBOE) would force the school districts in Texas to buy and from which these school districts would teach their students. As was cited in the blog many other states use the text book selections made by the Texas SBOE in their text book selections. This may be done because they lack the staffing or funding to do their own selections; however, there is another factor to consider. Since the group who select the text books for Texas’ SBOE is apparently the largest and most powerful they are the one who the text book publishers listen to as they (the publishers) don’t want to have to publish different books for each state or school district. The result is these states are not standing up for themselves and their students may be taught information that goes against established data (scientific or otherwise) or their own beliefs or philosophies.
Yes, i’ve also wondered why other states take Texas lead on textbooks. But it would be a mess if all the states had their version of the Texas SBOE.
In Texas, primaries are open, meaning any voter can participate in the GOP primary election. Voters do not have to be registered members of a party to vote in that party’s primary. The primary election day is March 2. Even though I am not Republican, I am voting against McLeroy and for Thomas Ratliff, his opponent. I encourage you to do the same.
Thanks Michael,
I left off the election date of March 2.
Walking in the pesernce of giants here. Cool thinking all around!
I don’t know who either McLeroy or Thomas are. Are the running for a position of the Texas SBOE?
Why was this mentioned in the blog? I didn’t know the blog was for political discourse.
The aforementioned individuals are Don McLeroy and Thomas Ratcliff who are running for a place on the Texas SBOE. And it was mentioned in the blog. (read Nancy W’s contribution on the ehtics of the matter).
MOnte – Other states don’t “follow” Texas in textbook adoptions because of lack of staff or expertisse, but because the textbook companies cater to the largest purchasers of textbooks, Texas and California. They publish to the curriculum in those states. It would be too expensive to write and publish a book for each individual state.